It did have its purpose but causing the death of such a peaceful and majestic animal as the elephant could put you off that story! The crowd roars in excitement, and the elephant appears suddenly weakened. The British were still in control of the Indian subcontinent. Shooting an Elephant Analysis: About the Author: George Orwell was one of the most prominent writers of the twentieth century who was well-known for his essays, novels, and articles. The elephant can also be seen as dangerous and destructive just as the British have been within their colonies. I completely agree with this reflection because things like this happen everyday. The hunter caught in the hunted's eye. The film was shot entirely on location in Nepal starring Barry Sloane as Eric Blair.
He enriches the text with imagery and when I was reading Shooting an Elephant, I could picture everything going on- the elephant getting shot,the look in his eyes, the whole scene. After that, he began to feel uncomfortable and pressured by the crowd to shoot the elephant once he found him. He hated imperialism and he was secretly in favor of the Burmese. Upon laying eyes on the elephant he instantly feels that it would be wrong to kill it. I just finished reading it in my class and it makes a lot of sense the way you described it. Yet, his insecurities with a gun get the best of him and he discards a strategy that would have allowed him to remain neutral. It is about Orwell's job as a police officer in Burma, a job which he hated.
He abandoned his morals in order to keep in jood terms with the Indian people. If they elephant came at him, he would shoot. His work is marked by keen intelligence and wit, a profound awareness of social injustice, an intense opposition to totalitarianism, a passion for clarity in language, and a belief in democratic socialism. This is a great short essay by Orwell, autobiographical. Orwell has a gun but he does not want to shoot the innocent creature at all.
I had committed myself to doing it when I sent for the rifle. The essay finishes with him wondering if they will even understand his motive for having killed the elephant as he merely wished to salvage his pride. Most people would not want to shoot an innocent creature but at the same time would have to in order to avoid any type of humiliation from the onlooking crowd. And as Orwell goes for the kill, he still humanizes the elephant, in no way trying to undermine the act by excuses of any sort. How could one neglect others let alone two-thousand from doing what is told.
It has trampled grass huts and turned over a garbage disposal van and it has killed a man. He fires again and it comes back up, dramatically rising on hind legs and lifting its trunk before thundering to the earth. Because he is, like the rest of the English, a military occupier, he is hated by much of the village. This section contains 345 words approx. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. Orwell uses the elephant, a very powerful and stately animal, as a metaphor for the British Empire and the power they represent.
The rulers were ready to take the life of any local who dared to stand or speak against their oppression. Using his writing to confess the inner conflict of an imperial police officer, he wrote an autobiographical essay titled Shooting an Elephant. The elephant is also a symbol for the previous empire, and in shooting it, he shows his hatred towards British Imperialism and its cruelty. He often describes that the British presence there were greatly despised and that he himself has been a target multiple times by the Burmese people. Orwell fires again, and the elephant does not fall—instead, it wobbles back onto its feet. They were waiting for something to happen; they were looking at officer as he is a.
The way you ended this post was great. I completely agree with what the writer had to say about George Orwells essay. Using this episode which resulted in the clash between his own personal beliefs and the expectations of those around him, Orwell sends a message that imperialism is a lose-lose game that hurts the oppressed, as well as the oppressor. In spite of his reasoned introspection, he cannot resist the actions that the role forces him to make in order to display his power. However, after he makes this decision, Orwell glances back at the crowd behind him.
To view it, Strong political messages that could apply to individuals as well as society in general. If anyone is looking to build off of this post, then please cite this blog in your paper and write away. He shoots the elephant in order to keep his job, as well as to save face. The narrator then sees a village woman chasing away children who are looking at the corpse of an Indian whom the elephant has trampled and killed. There are many people that come across difficult times in their lives and one must over come them. This is how people may come to do things morally wrong and unjust.
We all as humans go through things like this everyday. Even villagers gets upset about the ordeal, but he is ordered to restore the village before more destruction. This elephant was not wild, but normally tame and broke loose due to sexual desire. The essay starts with the description that the narrator, Orwell, is a Analytical Summary Shooting an Elephant Shooting an Elephant, written by George Orwell, is a short autobiographical essay about an incident that occurred during the time of his service as a police officer in Burma. When the elephant kills one of the locals, Orwill gets a gun; not to kill, but to protect. But will he kill the elephant against his better judgment because the locals expect him to do the job? Orwell's worry was also not to lose the authority that is showed by the presence of the soldiers there, and he had to show. He resents the British presence in the country.
Inevitably then, he faces challenges as a police officer representing British imperial power. While Orwell states that he is very much against imperialism and wants the freedom of the Burmese people, he also admits to sometimes hating these people who treat Europeans so badly I mean, you can argue that this is justified, but still Despite the political reflection, this Read for my Creative Non-fiction course homework for 26. I believe it was not an easy desition to make, but he was weak to give in. For example, much like the Burmese who have been colonized and who abuse Orwell, the elephant has been provoked to destructive behavior by being oppressed. Please feel free to share what you write with me and what you discover about Orwell. Secondly, he feels stuck between both of them. However, to do this would endanger Orwell, and worse still, he would look like an idiot if the elephant maimed him in front of the natives.