This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the. Archived from on 2 February 2007. According to the , in 2015, 1,491 people were arrested under Section 377, including 207 minors 14% and 16 women. Non-appearance in response to a proclamation under section 82 of Act 2 of 1974. A cheque upon a banker is a document.
Even if no one answers your call, pretend you are in a conversation. The original section 18 was rep. This agreement implies the consent of each to suffer any harm which, in the course of such fencing, may be caused without foul play ; and if A, while playing fairly, hurts Z, A commits no offence. In the instant case, the injury caused was the result of blow with a knife in the stomach which was given with such force that the weapon had penetrated the abdomen and had injured the bowels. Giving false information respecting an offence committed Whoever knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, gives any information respecting that offence which he knows or believes to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two year, or with fine, or with both.
A is guilty of abetting that offence by conspiracy, and is liable to the punishment for murder. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object If an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly, or such as the members or that assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of the committing of that offence, is a member of the same assembly, is guilty of that offence. Fraudulently or dishonestly diminishing weight or altering composition of coin Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly performs on any coin any operation which diminishes the weight or alters the composition of that coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. State Amendment Uttar Pradesh In Uttar Pradesh the offence under section 363, I. Kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person with intent to cause that person to be secretly and wrongfully confined, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. None of the injuries was on a vital part of the body of the deceased. A believing in good faith that he can by no other means prevent himself from being horsewhipped, shoots Z dead. Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued Whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this chapter. A, though guilty of abetting the burning of the house, is not guilty of abetting the theft; for the theft was a distinct act, and not a probable consequence of the burning.
Causing hurt by means of poison, etc. And whoever publishes any proposal to pay any sum, or to deliver any goods, or to do or forbear doing anything for the benefit of any person, on any event or contingency relative or applicable to the drawing of any ticket, lot, number or figure in any such lottery, shall be punished with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. Whoever assaults or threatens to assault, or obstructs or attempts to obstruct, any public servant in the discharge of his duty as such public servant, in endeavouring to disperse an unlawful assembly, or to suppress a riot or affray, or uses, or threatens, or attempts to use criminal force to such public servant, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. A has committed no offence. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:— First. Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.
Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, causes any evidence of the commission of that offence to disappear, with the intention of screening the offender from legal punishment, or with that intention gives any information respecting the offence which he knows or believes to be false; if a capital offence. Illustration A, an officer of police, being legally bound to give information of all designs to commit robbery which may come to his knowledge, and knowing that B designs to commit robbery, omits to give such information, with intent to facilitate the commission of that offence. The patient dies in consequence of the shock. Where, on a sudden quarrel, a person in the heat of the moment picks up a weapon which is handy and causes injuries, one of which proves fatal, he would be entitled to the benefit of this Exception provided he has not acted cruelly; Samuthram alias Samudra Rajan v. A potential attacker is now your de facto protector.
The original words have successively been amended by Act 12 of 1891, sec. Accident in doing a lawful act Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution. Explanation 2 Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act. Experts Say: Enter the lift ……… If you need to reach the 13th floor, press all the buttons up to your destination. Illustration A attacks Z under such circumstances of grave provocation that his killing of Z would be only culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Activists against Section 377 argue that the law is against teh Indian Constitution. Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 335, voluntarily causes grievous hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Clause First omitted by the A. In a prosecution under section 504 against the accused for having insulted the complainant, the submission was made on behalf of the accused that the triviality of the act with a view to befooling a member of the fraternity should operate as a bar to the wrong alleged. He is a regular drinker.
A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage. Ultimately, it appeared that she was done to death and her body was cremated without sending any information to her parents or any relatives. Public servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture Whoever, being a public servant, knowingly disobeys any direction of the law as to the way in which he is conduct himself as such public servant, intending thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or subject him to a less punishment than that to which he is liable, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or any charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. The matter is presently in Supreme Court, which has constituted a five member bench to hear a reconsideration of its December 2013 verdict that upheld the law. A not intending to repay it A cheats. State of Tamil Nadu, 1997 3 Crimes 146 Mad.