The colonists had never acceptedthe fact that there was a high tax on tea and the Tea Act reignitedtheir disagreement with it. The company carried out ma … ny governmental and military functions in Asia for the Crown. Americans wanted to show that they were just as good as English people, just as trendy, just as well-mannered. The theoretical implications of the Coercive Acts were brilliantly summarized by Bernard Bailyn The Origins of American Politics, 1967, pp. This situation lead to the Boston Tea Party. The Townshend Duties were still in place, however, and the radical leaders in America found reason to believe that this act was a maneuver to buy popular support for the taxes already in force. The desperate attempt drastically reduced the price of their tea in order to attract a lot of buyers and to compete with the tea shipped from Holland.
So we see why tea became the flashpoint for rebellion in America. It was an act established on 1773 by the British Parliament that stated that the East Indian Company would have to cruise directly to the American colonies to export their tea instead of going first to Britain and then export it again to the same colonies. When things like this happen, you feel angry and you might even want to get revenge by doing something bold, like dumping the bully's lunch tray on the floor. The Tea Act actually revived the flagging careers of agitators like , who had been frustrated in recent years by the relative calm in the relationship with the mother country. Its purpose was to save the East India Company from bankruptcy by removing all duties on tea shipped, making the price of British tea much lower than the colonial tea price. The Boston Tea Party was a symbolic act that showed the British how far American colonists were willing to go to speak out for their freedom.
Their response was to refuse to unload the tea from the ships. The Boston Tea Party may not have yielded immediate results, but it fueled the fire of patriotism in the Americans. The Indians had washed and changed their clothes long before the meeting was … over. In Charleston, the colonists left the tea on the docks to rot. The Boston Port Act June 1, 1774 closed the harbor until the value of the tea was reimbursed. In order to achieve this type of power, the British Parliament instigated a series of taxes that the inhabitants of the colonies were required to pay.
They originally ran their business by monopolizing tea throughout the colonies. Under certain conditions which I will discuss in a later essay , resistance against specific laws was viewed by Radical Whigs as justifiable, but revolution was another matter entirely. While there was a lot of anger and resentment, history shows that the colonists had held many organized meetings to discuss the events that were unfolding in their cities. Since the Stamp Act crisis of 1765, radical colonists had warned that new British taxes heralded an attempt to overthrow representative government in the colonies and to subjugate the colonists to British tyranny. Cargoes of tea filled the harbor, and the British ship's crews were stalled in Boston looking for work and often finding trouble.
A revolution was not justified unless it could be shown that unjust laws were part of an overall plan to establish despotism. Tea from British suppliers was expensive. Tea Act The British government, having rashly determined to enforce the Tea-duty Act, of which the most considerable effect hitherto was a vast importation of smuggled tea into America by the French, the Dutch, the Danes, and the SweTea Act The British government, having rashly determined to enforce the Tea-duty Act, of which the most considerable effect hitherto was a vast importation of smuggled tea into America by the French, the Dutch, the Danes, and the Swedes. Now this became a very dangerous situation for the company; huge piles of boxes were left to rot inside their warehouses since no one was buying them. The colonists were illegally moving the tea across their borders, and this was costing the East India Tea Company a lot of money.
The American consumption of smuggled tea hurt the finances of the East India Company, which was already struggling through economic hardship. One of the main leaders in the protest in the colonies against the Tea Tax was John Hancock. British Prime Minister Frederick North initiated the Tea Act under the assumption that colonists would welcome cheap prices on legal tea. So why was a masked raid on tea-carrying boats such a big deal? The Boston Tea Party was the beginning of a revolution where Americans would come out victorious and independent of British rule. However, a drastic turn of events occurred in Boston. While the Tea Act passed by Parliament in May, 1773 was one of the major events leading to war with Great Britain, it was not designed to tax the colonies but to bail out the East India Tea Company, a private commercial trading company that was involved in trade with Asia. Now tea rolled into America in ever-larger amounts, which brought the price down nicely for consumers, but also threatened American security because the option to purchase tea was seeming more and more like an obligation to do so.
Along with the tax, the British government gave the British East India Company special selling privileges that hurt American merchants. The parliament needed to pay for the debts that they had from the previous wars that they had been in. Tea-drinking was the center of domestic rituals in households high and low, and owning all the accoutrements of tea-making and drinking was to have status—status that was recognized on both sides of the Atlantic. Unfortunately for Townshend, the Stamp Act had aroused colonial resentment to all new taxes, whether levied on imports or on the colonists directly. As a reward, it was granted a monopoly of the trade in India. But this was an issue that went much deeper than the cost of tea.
Myth series is deeply indebted. Well, the East Indian Company wasn't doing so well, and the British wanted to give it some more business. On the evening of December 16, 1773, patriots disguised as Indians boarded three ships in Boston Harbor and threw over three hundred crates of tea into the water to make sure the tea did not get unloaded. The Boston Tea Party was by no means an act of lost tempers and hotheads. The colonists saw these acts for exactly what they were: an attempt by Parliament to gain complete control over the colonists. In 1767, British policymakers had imposed a and other commodities destined for the colonies. The smugglers were upset and two of the biggest smug … glers in the colonies were Hamilton and Hancock.
On the night of December 16, 1773 young men climbed aboard these ships, opened cargo locks and tea chests sending the tea flying off into the sea. What political power might it be given in America? While the East India Company held a monopoly in most of the British Empire, it struggled in the colonies because colonial merchants sold illegally smuggled tea from competitors, such as the Dutch. Americans boycotted tea to protest the Townshend Acts. Individual details — Stamp Act, Townshend Duties, Boston Massacre, and ultimately and overwhelmingly the Coercive Acts — added up to something greater, more malevolent than their simple sum, which was finally and fully revealed in the substitution of military for civil actions in 1775. He did not allow the tea ships to leave without getting paid for the tea.